4.6 Article

Fully self-consistent GW and quasiparticle self-consistent GW for molecules

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 89, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.155417

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CSIC JAE-doc program
  2. European Science Foundation
  3. Diputacion Foral de Gipuzkoa
  4. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)
  5. Basque Departamento de Educacion, UPV/EHU [IT-366-07]
  6. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [FIS2010-19609-C02-02]
  7. ETORTEK program
  8. Basque Departamento de Industria
  9. German DFG [SFB 1083]
  10. ORGAVOLT-ANR project
  11. Euroregion Aquitaine-Euskadi program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two self-consistent schemes involving Hedin's GW approximation are studied for a set of sixteen different atoms and small molecules. We compare results from the fully self-consistent GW approximation (SCGW) and the quasiparticle self-consistent GW approximation (QSGW) within the same numerical framework. Core and valence electrons are treated on an equal footing in all the steps of the calculation. We use basis sets of localized functions to handle the space dependence of quantities and spectral functions to deal with their frequency dependence. We compare SCGW and QSGW on a qualitative level by comparing the computed densities of states (DOS). To judge their relative merit on a quantitative level, we compare their vertical ionization potentials (IPs) with those obtained from coupled-cluster calculations CCSD(T). Our results are futher compared with one-shot G(0)W(0) calculations starting from Hartree-Fock solutions (G(0)W(0)-HF). Both self-consistent GW approaches behave quite similarly. Averaging over all the studied molecules, both methods show only a small improvement (somewhat larger for SCGW) of the calculated IPs with respect to G(0)W(0)-HF results. Interestingly, SCGW and QSGW calculations tend to deviate in opposite directions with respect to CCSD(T) results. SCGW systematically underestimates the IPs, while QSGW tends to overestimate them. G(0)W(0)-HF produces results which are surprisingly close to QSGW calculations both for the DOS and for the numerical values of the IPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available