4.6 Article

Role of axion electrodynamics in a Weyl metal: Violation of Wiedemann-Franz law

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 90, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.121108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2012R1A1B3000550, 2011-0030785]
  2. TJ Park Science Fellowship of the POSCO TJ Park Foundation
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0030046, 2012R1A1B3000550] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, enhancement of the longitudinal magnetoelectrical conductivity (LMEC) has been observed in Bi1-xSbx around x similar to 3% under E parallel to B (E, external electric field and B, external magnetic field) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 246603 (2013)], where an enhancement factor proportional to B-2 is suggested to result from the E . B term. In the present study, we show that this B-2 enhancement is not limited on the LMEC, where both the Seebeck and thermal conductivities in the longitudinal setup (E parallel to B) are predicted to show essentially the same enhancement proportional to B-2. In particular, the B-2 enhancement factor of the LMEC turns out to differ from that of the longitudinal thermal conductivity, responsible for the breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz (WF) law, which means that anomalous currents flowing through the dissipationless channel differ from each other. Since the breakdown of the WF law appears in spite of the existence of electron quasiparticles, regarded to be a purely topological character (chiral anomaly), the Weyl metallic state cannot be identified with the Landau Fermi-liquid fixed point. We propose the violation of the WF law as another hallmark of the Weyl metallic phase, which originates from axion electrodynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available