4.6 Article

Self-consistent determination of Hubbard U for explaining the anomalous magnetism of the Gd13 cluster

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 89, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.085103

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-96ER45579]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-11274146]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB933101]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2022013zrct01]
  5. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effective on-site Coulomb interaction (Hubbard U) is an important parameter for studying strongly correlated systems. While U is determined empirically by fitting to bulk values, its value for a cluster with a finite number of atoms remains uncertain. Here, we choose Gd-13 as a prototypical example of a strongly correlated cluster. Contrary to the well-known results in transition-metal clusters where magnetic moments of clusters are larger than their bulk, in Gd-13 cluster the magnetic moment is smaller than its bulk value. Using density functional theory and the linear response approach, we determine U self-consistently for the cluster and apply it to explain the anomalous magnetic properties of Gd-13. We demonstrate that the interaction between core and shell atoms of the Gd-13 cluster strongly depends on the Hubbard U. For U = 0 eV magnetism is governed by a direct f-f electron interaction between core and shell atoms, while for U = 5.5 eV it is the indirect Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida interaction that prevails. We also demonstrate that the noncollinear spin arrangement of each atom in the cluster strongly depends on the Hubbard U. Monte Carlo calculations further confirm that magnetic moments decrease with temperature, thus addressing a long-standing disagreement in experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available