4.6 Article

Radiative transitions in highly doped and compensated chalcopyrites and kesterites: The case of Cu2ZnSnS4

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 90, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.235202

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/CTM-MET/113486/2009, PEST-C/CTM/LA0025/2011, RECI/FIS-NAN/0183/2012 (COMPETE: FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027494)]
  2. EU through the FP7 Marie Curie IEF Action [327367]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/CTM-MET/113486/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The theoretical models of radiative recombinations in both CuIn1-xGaxSe2 chalcopyrite and Cu2ZnSnS4 kesterite, and related compounds, were revised. For heavily doped materials, electrons are free or bound to large donor agglomerates which hinders the involvement of single donors in the radiative recombination channels. In this work, we investigated the temperature and excitation power dependencies of the photoluminescence of Cu2ZnSnS4-based solar cells in which the absorber layer was grown through sulphurization of multiperiod structures of precursor layers. For both samples the luminescence is dominated by an asymmetric band with peak energy at similar to 1.22 eV, which is influenced by fluctuating potentials in both conduction and valence bands. A value of similar to 60 meV was estimated for the root-mean-square depth of the tails in the conduction band. The radiative transitions involve the recombination of electrons captured by localized states in tails of the conduction band with holes localized in neighboring acceptors that follow the fluctuations in the valence band. The same acceptor level with an ionization energy of similar to 280 meV was identified in both absorber layers. The influence of fluctuating potentials in the electrical performance of the solar cells was discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available