4.6 Article

Stability and electronic structure of Cu2ZnSnS4 surfaces: First-principles study

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.045427

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Special Funds for Major State Basic Research
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  3. International collaboration project
  4. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar)
  5. NSFC [61106087, 10934002, 91233121]
  6. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08GO28308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently little is known about the atomic and electronic structure of Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) surfaces, although the efficiency of kesterite-based solar cells has been increased to over 11%. Through the first-principles calculations, we studied the possible surface structures of the frequently observed cation-terminated (112) and anion-terminated ((1) over bar(1) over bar(2) over bar) surfaces, and found that the polar surfaces are stabilized by the charge-compensating defects, such as vacancies (V-Cu, V-Zn), antisites (Zn-Cu, Zn-Sn, Sn-Zn), and defect clusters (Cu-Zn + Cu-Sn, 2Zn(Cu) + V-Sn). In stoichiometric single-phase CZTS samples, Cu-enriched defects are favored on (112) surfaces and Cu-depleted defects are favored on ((1) over bar(1) over bar(2) over bar) surfaces, while in non-stoichiometric samples grown under Cu poor and Zn rich conditions both surfaces favor the Cu-depleted defects, which explains the observed Cu deficiency on the surfaces of the synthesized CZTS thin films. The electronic structure analysis shows that Cu-enriched surfaces produce detrimental states in the band gap, while Cu-depleted surfaces produce no gap states and are thus benign to the solar cell performance. The calculated surface properties are consistent with experimental observation that Cu-poor and Zn-rich CZTS solar cells have higher efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available