4.6 Article

Generic quantum spin ice

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 86, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.104412

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE through Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-08ER46524]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY-0551164]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [19052006]
  4. Japan Society of Promotion of Science [21740275, 24740253]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24740253, 21740275] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider possible exotic ground states of quantum spin ice as realized in rare earth pyrochlores. Prior work [Savary and Balents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 037202 (2012).] introduced a gauge mean-field theory (gMFT) to treat spin or pseudospin Hamiltonians for such systems, reformulated as a problem of bosonic spinons coupled to a U(1) gauge field. We extend gMFT to treat the most general nearest-neighbor exchange Hamiltonian, which contains a further exchange interaction. This term leads to interactions between spinons and requires a significant extension of gMFT, which we provide. As an application, we focus especially on the non-Kramers materials Pr2TM2O7 (TM = Sn, Zr, Hf, and Ir), for which the additional term is especially important, but for which an Ising-planar exchange coupling discussed previously is forbidden by time-reversal symmetry. In this case, when the planar XY exchange is unfrustrated, we perform a full analysis and find three quantum ground states: a U(1) quantum spin liquid (QSL), an antiferroquadrupolar ordered state and a noncoplanar ferroquadrupolar ordered one. We also consider the case of frustrated XY exchange, and find that it favors a pi-flux QSL, with an emergent line degeneracy of low-energy spinon excitations. This feature greatly enhances the stability of the QSL with respect to classical ordering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available