4.6 Article

Validity of the rigid band approximation in the study of the thermopower of narrow band gap semiconductors

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 85, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.165149

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Revolutionary Materials for Solid State Energy Conversion, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001054]
  3. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Theoretical studies of thermoelectric properties using ab initio electronic structure calculations help not only to understand existing experimental data but also to predict new materials which can be potentially good thermoelectrics. However, in these studies it is inevitable to employ some approximations. It is therefore important to verify their reliability. To this end, we have investigated the validity of the rigid band approximation (RBA), commonly used in calculating the thermopower (S) in doped (sometimes heavily) narrow band gap semiconductors. We have considered two important systems: half-Heusler HfCoSb and PbTe. We calculate band structures of pure and doped systems [using quasiperiodic approximation (QPA)] by employing the density-functional method. We then use Boltzmann transport theory to calculate the thermopower using both RBA and the band structure with QPA. We find that band structures do not change significantly when isovalent impurities are present excepting in specific cases. However, charged impurities (relevant to the doping case) providing carriers can change the host band structure appreciably. We find that impurities in general remove existing degeneracies which tend to reduce the RBA value of |S|. The reduction is significant in both HfCoSb and PbTe when charged defects are present.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available