4.6 Article

LiBeB: A predicted phase with structural and electronic peculiarities

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.014104

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EFree, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. US Department of Energy [DESC0001057]
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-0910623, DMR-0907425, ECS-0335765]
  4. National Center for Supercomputer Applications [TG-DMR060055N]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [910623] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [907425] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beginning an in-depth analysis of binaries and ternaries in the Li-Be-B system, we examine the static structures and electronic properties of LiBeB (i.e., 1:1:1) over a range of pressures. This as-yet unknown compound is predicted to possess a stable ground state at 1 atm and some higher pressures. As the pressure rises, LiBeB goes through a diverse series of structures, beginning with metallic structures, which feature chains and layers of atoms, progressing to structures built on colorings of the Laves phases, and containing helical arrangements of boron atoms, on to high-pressure phases that are ternary variants of a body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice. The density of states (DOS) at the Fermi level consistently falls in a pseudogap (sometimes a complete gap is predicted); LiBeB is unlikely to be a good metal or superconductor. The distribution of the DOS follows what electronegativity would predict-Li electrons are transferred to B. Some curious features of the LiBeB structures emerge, including near-icosahedral coordination, independent of atom type; in a range of pressures, a resemblance of the total DOS to that of metallic Be; and also a Dirac surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available