4.6 Article

Projective ribbon permutation statistics: A remnant of non-Abelian braiding in higher dimensions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 83, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.115132

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a recent paper, Teo and Kane [Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 046401 (2010)] proposed a three-dimensional (3D) model in which the defects support Majorana fermion zero modes. They argued that exchanging and twisting these defects would implement a set R of unitary transformations on the zero-mode Hilbert space which is a ghostly recollection of the action of the braid group on Ising anyons in two dimensions. In this paper, we find the group T-2n, which governs the statistics of these defects by analyzing the topology of the space K-2n of configurations of 2n defects in a slowly spatially varying gapped free-fermion Hamiltonian: T-2n pi(1)(K-2n). We find that the group T-2n = Z x T-2n(r) , where the ribbon permutation group T-2n(r) is a mild enhancement of the permutation group S-2n : T-2n(r) = Z(2) x E((Z(2))S-2n similar to(2n)). Here, E((Z(2))(2n) similar to S-2n) is the even part of (Z(2))(2n) similar to S-2n, namely, those elements for which the total parity of the element in (Z(2))(2n) added to the parity of the permutation is even. Surprisingly, R is only a projective representation of T-2n, a possibility proposed by Wilczek [e-print arXiv:hep-th/9806228]. Thus, Teo and Kane's defects realize projective ribbon permutation statistics, which we show to be consistent with locality. We extend this phenomenon to other dimensions, codimensions, and symmetry classes. We note that our analysis applies to 3D networks of quantum wires supporting Majorana fermions; thus, these networks are not required to be planar. Because it is an essential input for our calculation, we review the topological classification of gapped free-fermion systems and its relation to Bott periodicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available