4.6 Article

Specific heat in KFe2As2 in zero and applied magnetic field

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 83, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.172502

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States Department of Energy [DE-FG02-86ER45268]
  2. United States National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The specific heat down to 0.08 K of the iron pnictide superconductor KFe2As2 was measured on a single-crystal sample with a residual resistivity ratio of similar to 650, with a T-c(onset) determined by a specific heat of 3.7 K. The zero-field normal-state specific heat divided by temperature, C/T, was extrapolated from above T-c to T = 0 by insisting on agreement between the extrapolated normal-state entropy at T-c, S-n(extrap) (T-c), and the measured superconducting-state entropy at T-c, S-s(meas) (T-c), since for a second-order phase transition the two entropies must be equal. This extrapolation would indicate that this rather clean sample of KFe2As2 exhibits non-Fermi-liquid behavior; i.e., C/T increases at low temperatures, in agreement with the reported non-Fermi-liquid behavior in the resistivity. However, specific heat as a function of magnetic field shows that the shoulder feature around 0.7 K, which is commonly seen in KFe2As2 samples, is not evidence for a second superconducting gap as has been previously proposed but instead is due to an unknown magnetic impurity phase, which can affect the entropy balance and the extrapolation of the normal-state specific heat. This peak (somewhat larger in magnitude) with similar field dependence is also found in a less pure sample of KFe2As2, with a residual resistivity ratio of only 90 and T-c(onset)=3.1 K. These data, combined with the measured normal-state specific heat in field to suppress superconductivity, allow the conclusion that an increase in the normal-state specific heat as T. 0 is in fact not seen in KFe2As2; i.e., Fermi-liquid behavior is observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available