4.6 Article

Isotropic three-dimensional gap in the iron arsenide superconductor LiFeAs from directional heat transport measurements

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.054507

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-07CH11358]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. NRF [2010-0007487, 2010-0029136]
  4. MEST
  5. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  6. NSERC
  7. CFI
  8. FQRNT
  9. Canada Research Chair
  10. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0007487, 2010-0029136] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermal conductivity kappa of the iron-arsenide superconductor LiFeAs (T-c similar or equal to 18 K) was measured in single crystals at temperatures down to T similar or equal to 50 mK and in magnetic fields up to H = 17 T, very close to the upper critical field H-c2 similar or equal to 18 T. For both directions of the heat current, parallel and perpendicular to the tetragonal c axis, a negligible residual linear term kappa/T is found as T -> 0, showing that there are no zero-energy quasiparticles in the superconducting state. The increase in kappa with magnetic field is the same for both current directions and it follows the dependence expected for an isotropic superconducting gap. These findings show that the superconducting gap in LiFeAs is isotropic in 3D, without nodes or deep minima anywhere on the Fermi surface. We discuss how this behavior of the thermal conductivity may be reconciled with the multiband character of superconductivity in LiFeAs inferred from other measurements. Comparison with other iron-pnictide superconductors suggests that a nodeless isotropic gap is a common feature at optimal doping (maximal T-c).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available