4.6 Article

Atomistic simulations of low-field mobility in Si nanowires: Influence of confinement and orientation

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 84, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.085313

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Climate and Energy Fund [825467]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simulation framework that couples atomistic electronic structures to Boltzmann transport formalism is developed and applied to calculate the transport characteristics of thin silicon nanowires (NWs) up to 12 nm in diameter. The sp(3)d(5)s*-spin-orbit-coupled atomistic tight-binding model is used for the electronic structure calculation. Linearized Boltzmann transport theory is applied, including carrier scattering by phonons, surface roughness (SRS), and impurities. We present a comprehensive investigation of the low-field mobility in silicon NWs considering i) n- and p-type NWs, ii) [100], [110], and [111] transport orientations, and iii) diameters from D = 12 nm (electronically almost bulk-like) down to D = 3 nm (ultra-scaled). The simulation results display strong variations in the characteristics of the different NW types. For n-type NWs, phonon scattering and SRS become stronger as the diameter is reduced and drastically degrade the mobility by up to an order of magnitude depending on the orientation. For the [111] and [110] p-type NWs, on the other hand, large mobility enhancements (on the order of similar to 4x) can be achieved as the diameter scales down to D = 3 nm. This enhancement originates from the increase in the subband curvatures as the diameter is scaled. It overcompensates for the mobility reduction caused by SRS in narrow NWs and offers an advantage with diameter scaling. Our results may provide understanding of recent experimental measurements, as well as guidance in the design of NW channel devices with improved transport properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available