4.6 Article

ac dynamics of ferroelectric domains from an investigation of the frequency dependence of hysteresis loops

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 82, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174125

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea government (MEST) [2009-0080567, 2010-0020416]
  2. Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the pinning dominated domain-wall dynamics under an ac field by studying the frequency (f) dependence of hysteresis loops of a uniaxial ferroelectric (FE) system. We measured the fully saturated polarization-electric field (P-E) hysteresis loops of high-quality epitaxial 100-nm-thick PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3 capacitors at various f (5-2000 Hz) and temperatures T (10-300 K). We observed that the coercive field EC is proportional to f(beta) with two scaling regions, which was also reported earlier in magnetic systems [T. A. Moore and J. A. C. Bland, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, R1369 (2004), and references therein]. In addition, we observed that the two scaling regions of EC vs f exist at all measured T. We found that the existence of the two scaling regions should come from a dynamic crossover between the creep and flow regimes of the FE domain-wall motions. By extending the theory of Nattermann et al., which was originally proposed for impure magnet systems [T. Nattermann, V. Pokrovsky, and V. M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 197005 (2001)], to the disordered FE systems, we obtained analytical expressions for the dynamic crossovers between the relaxation and creep, and between the creep and flow regimes. By comparing with the experimental data from our fully saturated P-E hysteresis loop measurements, we could construct a T-E dynamic phase diagram with f as a parameter for hysteretic FE domain dynamics in the presence of an ac field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available