4.6 Article

Photoinduced fluidity in chalcogenide glasses at low and high intensities: A model accounting for photon efficiency

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 82, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.134114

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Research [25094-2007]
  2. NSF-DMR [0806333]
  3. NSF-ECCS [0901069]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0806333] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [0901069] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detailed measurements of photoinduced fluidity in Ge-Se glasses were performed using a novel shear relaxation test in torsion mode. It is shown that photofluidity is significant even at a very low intensity and that there is no apparent threshold for activating the photostructural processes. Instead, the mechanism of photofluidity is described as a cumulative process involving photoinduced motions of every atom within the irradiated volume. Based on this assumption, a model is proposed, which is shown to accurately predict the power and wavelength dependence of photofluidity using a single fitting parameter n. The factor n represents the photon efficiency for inducing an atomic motion. Photofluidity experiments performed on glass fibers of various mean coordination number indicate that the process is rapidly reduced in overconstrained glasses. The values of n obtained for these glasses correlate remarkably well with the mean coordination dependence of other photostructural changes (photodarkening, photoexpansion). This indicates that the model is physically sound. Moreover, the model is shown to quantitatively describe photofluidity data from other glass systems from literature, therefore suggesting that it could be universally applied to all chalcogenide glasses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available