4.6 Article

Phase transformation in Si from semiconducting diamond to metallic β-Sn phase in QMC and DFT under hydrostatic and anisotropic stress

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.014101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-99ER45795, DE-FG05-08OR23339]
  2. National Science Foundation [EAR-0703226, EAR-0530813, DMR-0908653]
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  4. National Center for Computational Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  5. National Center for Supercomputing Applications [DMR050036]
  6. Ohio Supercomputing Center
  7. Computation Center for Nanotechnology Innovation at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-99ER45795] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silicon undergoes a phase transition from the semiconducting diamond phase to the metallic beta-Sn phase under pressure. We use quantum Monte Carlo calculations to predict the transformation pressure and compare the results to density-functional calculations employing the local-density approximation, the generalized-gradient approximations PBE, PW91, WC, AM05, PBEsol, and the hybrid functional HSE06 for the exchange-correlation functional. Diffusion Monte Carlo predicts a transition pressure of 14.0 +/- 1.0 GPa slightly above the experimentally observed transition pressure range of 11.3-12.6 GPa. The HSE06 hybrid functional predicts a transition pressure of 12.4 GPa in excellent agreement with experiments. Exchange-correlation functionals using the local-density approximation and generalized-gradient approximations result in transition pressures ranging from 3.5 to 10.0 GPa, well below the experimental values. The transition pressure is sensitive to stress anisotropy. Anisotropy in the stress along any of the cubic axes of the diamond phase of silicon lowers the equilibrium transition pressure and may explain the discrepancy between the various experimental values as well as the small overestimate of the quantum Monte Carlo transition pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available