4.6 Article

Ferroelectric dead layer driven by a polar interface

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 82, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.094114

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0906443]
  2. Nanoelectronics Research Initiative of the Semiconductor Research Corporation
  3. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, NSF [DMR-0820521]
  4. Nebraska Research Initiative
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0906443] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on first-principles and model calculations we investigate the effect of polar interfaces on the ferroelectric stability of thin-film ferroelectrics. As a representative model, we consider a TiO2-terminated BaTiO3 film with LaO monolayers at the two interfaces that serve as doping layers. We find that the polar interfaces create an intrinsic electric field that is screened by the electron charge leaking into the BaTiO3 layer. The amount of the leaking charge is controlled by the boundary conditions which are different for three heterostructures considered, namely, vacuum/LaO/BaTiO3/LaO, LaO/BaTiO3, and SrRuO3/LaO/BaTiO3/LaO. The intrinsic electric field forces ionic displacements in BaTiO3 to produce the electric polarization directed into the interior of the BaTiO3 layer. This creates a ferroelectric dead layer near the interfaces that is nonswitchable and thus detrimental to ferroelectricity. Our first-principles and model calculations demonstrate that the effect is stronger for a larger effective ionic charge at the interface and longer screening length due to a stronger intrinsic electric field that penetrates deeper into the ferroelectric. The predicted mechanism for a ferroelectric dead layer at the interface controls the critical thickness for ferroelectricity in systems with polar interfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available