4.6 Article

Surface second-harmonic generation from scattering of surface plasmon polaritons from radially symmetric nanostructures

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 79, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235416

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [ECS-0523386, DMR-08-06682]
  2. AFOSR [FA9550-05-1-0428]
  3. EPSRC [EP/G030502/1]
  4. DOE [DE-FG02-ER14104]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [0806682] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G030502/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/G030502/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a comprehensive study of linear and nonlinear effects observed in the scattering process of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) from localized two-dimensional surface deformations at a metal/dielectric interface. Thus, the electromagnetic field at the fundamental frequency (FF), for both p and s polarizations, is first determined by solving the corresponding set of reduced Rayleigh equations. The complete solution of these equations allows us to investigate both the complex structure of the scattered electromagnetic field as well as subtle mechanisms by which incident SPPs are scattered into radiative modes (light) and outgoing SPP waves. Furthermore, the electromagnetic field at the FF is used to determine the nonlinear surface polarization at the second harmonic (SH) and subsequently both the electromagnetic field distributions as well as the amount of light generated at the SH. Calculations are performed for three geometries that are relevant in many experiments, namely, Gaussian, hemispherical, and cylindrical nanodefects. Finally, throughout our analysis, we discuss potential applications of our findings to surface spectroscopy, surface chemistry, or imaging techniques of surface nanodefects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available