4.6 Article

Pressure-induced diamond to β-tin transition in bulk silicon: A quantum Monte Carlo study

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 80, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.214116

Keywords

density functional theory; electron correlations; elemental semiconductors; exchange interactions (electron); Monte Carlo methods; silicon; solid-state phase transformations; total energy

Funding

  1. DOE [DE-FG05-08OR23340, DE-FG02-07ER46366]
  2. ONR [N000140510055, N000140811235]
  3. NSF [DMR-0535592]
  4. INCITE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pressure-induced structural phase transition from diamond to beta tin in silicon is an excellent test for theoretical total-energy methods. The transition pressure provides a sensitive measure of small relative energy changes between the two phases (one a semiconductor and the other a semimetal). Experimentally, the transition pressure is well characterized. Density-functional results exhibit sensitivity to the particular form of the exchange-correlation functional. Even the generally much more accurate diffusion Monte Carlo method has shown a noticeable fixed-node error. We use the recently developed phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) method to calculate the relative energy differences in the two phases. In this method, all but the error due to the phaseless constraint can be controlled systematically and driven to zero. In both structural phases we were able to benchmark the error of the phaseless constraint by carrying out exact unconstrained AFQMC calculations for small supercells. Comparison between the two shows that the systematic error in the absolute total energies due to the phaseless constraint is well within 0.5 mE(h)/atom. Consistent with these internal benchmarks, the transition pressure obtained by the phaseless AFQMC from large supercells is in very good agreement with experiment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available