4.6 Article

Engineering photon cascades from multiexciton complexes in a self-assembled quantum dot by a lateral electric field

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 79, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.035309

Keywords

biexcitons; binding energy; effective mass; exchange interactions (electron); Fermi level; luminescence; quantum dots; Stark effect

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, QuantumWorks
  2. Canadian Institute for Photonic Innovations
  3. NSERC-NRC-BDC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate theoretically that by applying an in-plane electric field it is possible to engineer and tune photon cascades originating from recombination of multiexciton complexes confined in self-assembled quantum dots. We find the multiexciton energies and states as functions of the field using the effective-mass configuration-interaction approach with the effects of electron-hole exchange treated perturbatively, and use Fermi's golden rule to compute the emission spectra. We show that the field-induced Stark shift of the energies of photons emitted by the biexciton and two linearly polarized excitons is strongly renormalized by the electron-hole interactions, which are governed by the separation of electrons and holes induced by the field. As a result, the effective Stark shifts of exciton and biexciton emission lines have opposite signs, leading to a removal of the biexciton binding energy at a finite field. This enables the cascade of a pair of polarization entangled photons in the presence of a finite exciton anisotropic exchange splitting. We compare these emission spectra to those of the charged exciton, the triplet biexciton, and the three-exciton complex. We find that the electric field and Coulomb interactions differentiate the biexciton-exciton cascade from other cascades, facilitating identification of its spectra and practical implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available