4.6 Article

First-principles approach to chemical diffusion of lithium atoms in a graphite intercalation compound

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 78, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.214303

Keywords

ab initio calculations; diffusion; graphite intercalation compounds; interstitials; lithium compounds; phonons; vacancies (crystal); vibrational modes

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [474]
  2. COE
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluate mean frequencies for atomic jumps in a crystal from first principles based on transition state theory, taking lithium diffusion by the interstitial and vacancy mechanisms in LiC(6) as a model case. The mean jump frequencies are quantitatively evaluated from the potential barriers and the phonon frequencies for both initial and saddle-point states of the jumps under the harmonic approximation. The lattice vibrations are treated within quantum statistics, not using the conventional treatment by Vineyard corresponding to the classical limit, and the discrepancy between the two treatments is quantitatively discussed. The apparent activation energies and the vibrational prefactors of the mean jump frequencies essentially depend on temperature, unlike in the case of the classical approximation. The discrepancies of the activation energies correspond to the changes in zero-point vibrational energy at 0 K, and there remains the effect even at 1000 K. With regard to the vibrational prefactors, the classical approximation extremely overestimates the prefactors at low temperatures while the discrepancies rapidly decrease with increasing temperature, e.g., by 30% at room temperature and by 5% at 1000 K. The calculated chemical diffusion coefficients of lithium atoms by the interstitial and vacancy mechanisms are 1x10(-11) and 1x10(-10) cm(2)/s, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available