4.6 Article

Theoretical prediction of perfect spin filtering at interfaces between close-packed surfaces of Ni or Co and graphite or graphene

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 78, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195419

Keywords

bonds (chemical); Brillouin zones; cobalt; copper; density functional theory; electronic structure; Fermi level; ferromagnetic materials; graphite; interface roughness; lattice constants; magnetic tunnelling; monolayers; nickel; spin polarised transport

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  2. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)
  3. EU [IST-021285-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The in-plane lattice constants of close-packed planes of fcc and hcp Ni and Co match that of graphite almost perfectly so that they share a common two-dimensional reciprocal space. Their electronic structures are such that they overlap in this reciprocal space for one spin direction only allowing us to predict perfect spin filtering for interfaces between graphite and (111) fcc or (0001) hcp Ni or Co. First-principles calculations of the scattering matrix show that the spin filtering is quite insensitive to amounts of interface roughness and disorder which drastically influence the spin-filtering properties of conventional magnetic tunnel junctions or interfaces between transition metals and semiconductors. When a single graphene sheet is adsorbed on these open d-shell transition-metal surfaces, its characteristic electronic structure, with topological singularities at the K points in the two-dimensional Brillouin zone, is destroyed by the chemical bonding. Because graphene bonds only weakly to Cu which has no states at the Fermi energy at the K point for either spin, the electronic structure of graphene can be restored by dusting Ni or Co with one or a few monolayers of Cu while still preserving the ideal spin-injection property.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available