4.6 Article

Comparison of different definitions of the geometric measure of entanglement

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MITACS
  2. NSERC
  3. Singapore MoE
  4. NRF as part of the Research Centres of Excellence programme
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [23-01770, 23540463, 23240001]
  6. Singapore National Research Foundation under NRF [NRF-NRFF2013-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several inequivalent definitions of the geometric measure of entanglement (GM) have been introduced and studied in the past. Here we review several known and new definitions, with the qualifying criterion being that for pure states the measure is a linear or logarithmic function of the maximal fidelity with product states. The entanglement axioms and properties of the measures are studied, and qualitative and quantitative comparisons are made between all definitions. Streltsov et al. [New J. Phys. 12, 123004 (2010)] proved the equivalence of two linear definitions of GM, whereas we show that the corresponding logarithmic definitions are distinct. Certain classes of states such as maximally correlated states and isotropic states are particularly valuable for this analysis. A little-known GM definition is found to be the first one to be both normalized and weakly monotonous, thus being a prime candidate for future studies of multipartite entanglement. We also find that a large class of graph states, which includes all cluster states, have a universal closest separable state that minimizes the quantum relative entropy, the Bures distance, and the trace distance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available