4.6 Article

Source attack of decoy-state quantum key distribution using phase information

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022308

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Basic Research Program of China Grants
  3. CAS and USTC Special Grant for Postgraduate Research, Innovation and Practice
  4. Quantum Communication Technology Co., Ltd., Anhui
  5. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CBA00300, 2011CBA00301]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61033001]
  7. 1000 Youth Fellowship program in China
  8. RGC Grant from the HKSAR Government [700712P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum key distribution (QKD) utilizes the laws of quantum mechanics to achieve information-theoretically secure key generation. This field is now approaching the stage of commercialization, but many practical QKD systems still suffer from security loopholes due to imperfect devices. In fact, practical attacks have successfully been demonstrated. Fortunately, most of them only exploit detection-side loopholes, which are now closed by the recent idea of measurement-device-independent QKD. On the other hand, little attention is paid to the source, which may still leave QKD systems insecure. In this work, we propose and demonstrate an attack that exploits a source-side loophole existing in qubit-based QKD systems using a weak coherent state source and decoy states. Specifically, by implementing a linear-optics unambiguous state discrimination measurement, we show that the security of a system without phase randomization-which is a step assumed in conventional security analyses but sometimes neglected in practice-can be compromised. We conclude that implementing phase randomization is essential to the security of decoy-state QKD systems under current security analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available