4.6 Article

Multilevel distillation of magic states for quantum computing

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Tokyo Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology
  2. NICT
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science through its FIRST Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We develop a procedure for distilling magic states used in universal quantum computing that requires substantially fewer initial resources than prior schemes. Our distillation circuit is based on a family of concatenated quantum codes that possess a transversal Hadamard operation, enabling each of these codes to distill the eigenstate of the Hadamard operator. A crucial result of this design is that low-fidelity magic states can be consumed to purify other high-fidelity magic states to even higher fidelity, which we call multilevel distillation. When distilling in the asymptotic regime of infidelity epsilon -> 0 for each input magic state, the number of input magic states consumed on average to yield an output state with infidelity O(epsilon(2r)) approaches 2(r) + 1, which comes close to saturating the conjectured bound in another investigation [Bravyi and Haah, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052329 ( 2012)]. We show numerically that there exist multilevel protocols such that the average number of magic states consumed to distill from error rate epsilon(in) = 0.01 to epsilon(out) in the range 10(-5)-10(-40) is about 14 log(10)(1/epsilon(out)) - 40; the efficiency of multilevel distillation dominates all other reported protocols when distilling Hadamard magic states from initial infidelity 0.01 to any final infidelity below 10(-7). These methods are an important advance for magic-state distillation circuits in high-performance quantum computing and provide insight into the limitations of nearly resource-optimal quantum error correction. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042305

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available