4.6 Article

Dyson norms in XUV and strong-field ionization of polyatomics: Cytosine and uracil

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.053406

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER15983, DE-PS02-08ER08-01]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-08ER15983] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extreme-ultraviolet (XUV) and strong-field valence ionization of cytosine and uracil is considered. We examine some simple estimates of the relative yields of the cation states populated following ionization and compare these to the results of a recently developed ab initio-type numerical model designed to compute strong-field ionization of molecules, the so-called time-dependent resolution in ionic states (TD-RIS) method. In analogy with one-photon XUV ionization, where the photoionization matrix elements can be related to the Dyson orbitals, we construct estimates for the yield of strong-field ionization (SFI) to different cation states based on the Dyson orbital norms and the Keldysh tunneling ionization rate. In the case of XUV ionization, the Dyson norms are shown to be good predictors of the relative cation yields when compared with the TD-RIS yields. The Dyson- and Keldysh-based models underestimate the yield to excited cation states in the case of SFI. The increased yield to the excited cation states in the TD-RIS results is attributed to the inclusion of multielectron effects and continuum structure not present in the simple models. The molecular Ammosov-Delone-Krainov (MO-ADK) method of calculating SFI is also considered. This later method is seen to agree more closely with the Dyson- and Keldysh-based estimates as it also fails to capture the multielectron effects and continuum structure included in the TD-RIS approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available