4.6 Article

Condensed ground states of frustrated Bose-Hubbard models

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.063625

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Trinity Hall Cambridge
  2. EPSRC [EP/F032773/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F032773/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/F032773/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study theoretically the ground states of two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard models which are frustrated by gauge fields. Motivated by recent proposals for the implementation of optically induced gauge potentials, we focus on the situation in which the imposed gauge fields give rise to a pattern of staggered fluxes of magnitude alpha and alternating in sign along one of the principal axes. For alpha = 1/2 this model is equivalent to the case of uniform flux per plaquette n(phi) = 1/2, which, in the hard-core limit, realizes the fully frustrated spin-1/2 XY model. We show that the mean-field ground states of this frustrated Bose-Hubbard model typically break translational symmetry. Given the presence of both a non-zero superfluid fraction and translational symmetry breaking, these phases are supersolid. We introduce a general numerical technique to detect broken symmetry condensates in exact diagonalization studies. Using this technique we show that, for all cases studied, the ground state of the Bose-Hubbard model with staggered flux alpha is condensed, and we obtain quantitative determinations of the condensate fraction. We discuss the experimental consequences of our results. In particular, we explain the meaning of gauge invariance in ultracold-atom systems subject to optically induced gauge potentials and show how the ability to imprint phase patterns prior to expansion can allow very useful additional information to be extracted from expansion images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available