4.6 Article

Fundamental photophysics and optical loss processes in Si-nanocrystal-doped microdisk resonators

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.023829

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a detailed analytical, numerical, and experimental study of microdisk resonators doped with nanometer sized silicon quantum dots (nanocrystals). An intuitive analytical ray-optics-based model is developed and used to capture the behavior of the quality factor (Q) as a function of the disk size and the attenuation coefficient. Two regimes in the behavior of Q with the disk size establish a simple design rule for optimizing the performance of these cavities. The validity of our analytical model is verified by full-vectorial finite element method calculations of the microcavity modes. Based on the predictions of the analytical and numerical calculations, we have fabricated microdisk resonators with diameters ranging between 2 and 8 mu m. Q > 10(3) are obtained for disk radii as small as 4 mu m-highest observed for Si-nanocrystal-doped microdisk resonators. The fundamental limit on Q is estimated by quantifying all of the potential optical loss processes through a careful analysis which includes the effects of nanocrystal size distribution. Our theoretical calculations match well with experiments and reveal that the line-edge roughness scattering and radiation loss can be minimized sufficiently to enable study and quantification of more fundamental optical loss processes of this material due to band-to-band absorption. Mie scattering, and free-carrier absorption in the Si nanocrystals. Using the experimental Q's and the mode volumes, we predict the maximum low-temperature Purcell enhancement factor in our structures on the order of 6 and with some design improvements enhancements up to 50 can be realized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available