4.6 Article

A conformation-selective IR-UV study of the dipeptides Ac-Phe-Ser-NH2 and Ac-Phe-Cys-NH2: probing the SH center dot center dot center dot O and OH center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen bond interactions

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages 10770-10778

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp00810c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EU ITN network ICONIC [238671]
  2. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)
  3. NWO BIG-programme
  4. NWO Physical Sciences (EW)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conformational preferences of peptides are mainly controlled by the stabilizing effect of intramolecular interactions. In peptides with polar side chains, not only the backbone but also the side chain interactions determine the resulting conformations. In this paper, the conformational preferences of the capped dipeptides Ac-Phe-Ser-NH2 (FS) and Ac-Phe-Cys-NH2 (FC) are resolved under laser-desorbed jet cooling conditions using IR-UV ion dip spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) quantum chemistry calculations. As serine (Ser) and cysteine (Cys) only differ in an OH (Ser) or SH (Cys) moiety; this subtle alteration allows us to study the effect of the difference in hydrogen bonding for an OH and SH group in detail, and its effect on the secondary structure. IR absorption spectra are recorded in the NH stretching region (3200-3600 cm(-1)). In combination with quantum chemical calculations the spectra provide a direct view of intramolecular interactions. Here, we show that both FS as FC share a singly gamma-folded backbone conformation as the most stable conformer. The hydrogen bond strength of OH center dot center dot center dot O (FS) is stronger than that of SH center dot center dot center dot O (FC), resulting in a more compact gamma turn structure. A second conformer is found for FC, showing a beta turn interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available