4.6 Article

Thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of heterogeneous photocatalysis for semiconductor systems

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages 8751-8760

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp55317e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB939704]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Wuhan University of Technology) [2013-II017]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the report of the Honda-Fujishima effect, heterogeneous photocatalysis has attracted much attention around the world because of its potential energy and environmental applications. Although great progresses have been made in recent years, most were focused on preparing highly-active photocatalysts and investigating visible light utilization. In fact, we are still unclear on the thermodynamic and kinetic nature of photocatalysis to date, which sometimes leads to misunderstandings for experimental results. It is timely to give a review and discussion on the thermodynamics and kinetics of photocatalysis, so as to direct future researches. However, there is an absence of a detailed review on this topic until now. In this article, we tried to review and discuss the thermodynamics and kinetics of photocatalysis. We explained the thermodynamic driving force of photocatalysis, and distinguished the functions of light and heat in photocatalysis. The Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model, the OH oxidation mechanism, and the direct-indirect (D-I) kinetic model were reviewed and compared. Some applications of the D-I model to study photocatalytic kinetics were also discussed. The electron transport mode and its importance in photocatalysis were investigated. Finally, the intrinsic relation between the kinetics and the thermodynamics of photocatalytic reactions was discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available