4.6 Article

Electronic structure of the oxygen evolving complex in photosystem II, as revealed by Mn-55 Davies ENDOR studies at 2.5 K

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages 7799-7812

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp55189j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the first Mn-55 pulsed ENDOR studies on the S-2 state multiline spin 1/2 centre of the oxygen evolving complex (OEC) in Photosystem II (PS II), at temperatures below 4.2 K. These were performed on highly active samples of spinach PS II core complexes, developed previously in our laboratories for photosystem spectroscopic use, at temperatures down to 2.5 K. Under these conditions, relaxation effects which have previously hindered observation of most of the manganese ENDOR resonances from the OEC coupled Mn cluster are suppressed. Mn-55 ENDOR hyperfine couplings ranging from similar to 50 to similar to 680 MHz are now seen on the S-2 state multiline EPR signal. These, together with complementary high resolution X-band CW EPR measurements and detailed simulations, reveal that at least two and probably three Mn hyperfine couplings with large anisotropy are seen, indicating that three Mn-III ions are likely present in the functional S-2 state of the enzyme. This suggests a low oxidation state paradigm for the OEC (mean Mn oxidation level 3.0 in the S-1 state) and unexpected Mn exchange coupling in the S-2 state, with two Mn ions nearly magnetically silent. Our results rationalize a number of previous ligand ESEEM/ENDOR studies and labelled water exchange experiments on the S-2 state of the photosystem, in a common picture which is closely consistent with recent photo-assembly (Kolling et al., Biophys. J. 2012, 103, 313-322) and large scale computational studies on the OEC (Gatt et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12025-12028, Kurashige et al. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 660-666).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available