4.6 Article

Infiltrating sulfur in hierarchical architecture MWCNT@meso C core-shell nanocomposites for lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages 9051-9057

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp51551f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-87ER45298]
  2. Energy Materials Center at Cornell (EMC2)
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy of Sciences [SE-SC0001086]
  4. National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers (MRSEC) [DMR 1120296]
  5. Huazhong University of Science & Technology, China [01-24-013040]
  6. American Chemical Society (ACS) Division of Analytical Chemistry (ACS)
  7. Eastman Chemical Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present hierarchical architecture MWCNT (multi-walled carbon nanotubes)@meso C core-shell nanostructures as a carbon matrix for effective trapping of sulfur/polysulfides as a cathode material for Li-S batteries. The unique structure of MWCNT@meso C core-shell nanocomposites was achieved by using a sol-gel coating method followed by nanocasting. By infiltrating sulfur into the matrix, S/MWCNT@meso C core-shell nanocomposites were achieved. This material exhibited an initial discharge capacity of 1248 mA h g(-1) although it decayed to about 640 mA h g(-1) after 50 cycles. However, this performance is much better than that of S directly deposited on MWCNT (S/MWCNT) which only retained a capacity of 120 mA h g(-1) after 50 cycles. Our composite exhibited excellent rate capability even at a discharge current density of 2 A g(-1). The improvement in electrochemical performance is attributed to the synergetic effect between MWCNT cores, which provide electronic conduction pathways, and the mesoporous carbon shells with a relatively high surface area, which can trap sulfur/polysulfides and provide Li+ ion pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available