4.6 Article

The electronic structure of MgO nanotubes. An ab initio quantum mechanical investigation

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 15, Issue 32, Pages 13296-13303

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp50979f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CINECA [HP10BLSOR4-2012]
  2. Mexican CONACyT [CB-2012-1 178853]
  3. Egyptian government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structural, vibrational and response properties of the (n,0) and (m, m) MgO nanotubes are computed by using a Gaussian type basis set, a hybrid functional (B3LYP) and the CRYSTAL09 code. Tubes in the range 6 <= n <= 140 and 3 <= m <= 70 were considered, being n = 2 x m the number of MgO units in the unit cell (so, the maximum number of atoms is 280). Tubes are built by rolling up the fully relaxed 2-D conventional cell (2 MgO units, with oxygen atoms protruding from the Mg plane alternately up and down by 0.38 angstrom). The relative stability of the (n, 0) with respect to the (m, m) family, the relaxation energy and equilibrium geometry, the band gap, the IR vibrational frequencies and intensities, and the electronic and ionic contributions to the polarizability are reported. All these properties are shown to converge smoothly to the monolayer values. Absence of negative vibrational frequencies confirms that the tubes have a stable structure. The parallel component of the polarizability alpha(parallel to) converges very rapidly to the monolayer value, whereas alpha(perpendicular to) is still changing at n = 140; however, when extrapolated to very large n values, it coincides with the monolayer value to within 1%. The electronic contribution to a is in all cases (alpha(parallel to) and alpha(perpendicular to); 6 <= n <= 140) smaller than the vibrational contribution by about a factor of three, at variance with respect to more covalent tubes such as the BN ones, for which the ratio between the two contributions is reversed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available