4.6 Article

Sacrificial polymer thin-film template with tunability to construct high-density Au nanoparticle arrays and their refractive index sensing

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 15, Issue 37, Pages 15499-15507

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp52816b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB127804]
  2. Institute for Clean Energy & Advanced Materials, (Southwest University, Chongqing, China)
  3. Chongqing Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Technologies of Clean Energies (Chongqing, China)
  4. Southwest University (Chongqing, China) [SWU111071]
  5. Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Rapid diagnosis of Dread Disease (Chongqing, China)
  6. Chongqing development and reform commission (Chongqing, China)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Great challenges still remain to assemble metal nanoparticles on a substrate with tunability, high density, robust stability, good dispersion and well-retained properties for various applications. Herein a new concept using a polymer thin-film as a sacrificial template is investigated to fabricate highly dense and well-dispersed nanoparticle arrays. In contrast to a conventional hard template, the polymer template is a porous multilayered film allowing in situ growth of Au nanoparticles with a restricted ripening mode, and tuning the nanoparticle size and density of the arrays is possible by simply adjusting the loading conditions. The prepared substrate-attached nanoparticle arrays demonstrate good thermal and chemical stability, while offering highly sensitive and tunable localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) refractive index sensing with a broad linear dynamic range. This method could be extended to controllably fabricate other robust and clean nanoparticle arrays on various substrates for various applications including sensing, catalysis and optoelectronics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available