4.6 Article

Revisiting electronic couplings and incoherent hopping models for electron transport in crystalline C-60 at ambient temperatures

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 14, Issue 40, Pages 13846-13852

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41348e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Humboldt Society Research Fellowship
  2. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F067496]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F067496/1, EP/F004699/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/F067496/1, EP/F004699/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assess the validity of incoherent hopping models that have previously been used to describe electron transport in crystalline C-60 at room temperature. To this end we present new density functional theory based calculations of the electron transfer parameter defining these models. Specifically, we report electronic coupling matrix elements for several ten thousand configurations that are thermally accessible to the C-60 molecules through rotational diffusion around their lattice sites. We find that the root-mean-square fluctuations of the electronic coupling matrix element (11 meV) are almost as large as the average value (14 meV) and that the distribution is well approximated by a Gaussian. Importantly, due to the small reorganisation energy of the C-60 dimer (approximate to 0.1 eV), the ET is almost activationless for the majority of configurations. Yet, for a small but significant fraction of orientations the coupling is so strong compared to reorganisation energy that no charge-localised state exists, a situation that is aggravated if zero-point motion of the nuclei is taken into account. The present calculations indicate that standard hopping models do not provide a sound description of electron transport in C-60, which might be the case for many other organics as well, and that approaches are needed that solve the electron dynamics directly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available