4.6 Article

Improving the calculation of electron paramagnetic resonance hyperfine coupling tensors for d-block metals

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 14, Issue 30, Pages 10669-10676

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp40969k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Center for Scientific Computing (DCSC)
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation
  4. Danish Councils for Independent Research (STENO program)
  5. Danish Councils for Independent Research (Sapere Aude program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calculation of hyperfine coupling constants (HFCs) of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance from first principles can be a beneficial complement to experimental data in cases where the molecular structure is unknown. We have recently investigated basis set convergence of HFCs in d-block complexes and obtained a set of basis functions for the elements Sc-Zn, which were saturated with respect to both the Fermi contact and spin-dipolar components of the hyperfine coupling tensor [Hedegard et al., J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2011, 7, 4077-4087]. Furthermore, a contraction scheme was proposed leading to very accurate, yet efficient basis sets for the elements Sc-Zn. Here this scheme is tested against a larger test set of molecules and a wider range of DFT functionals. We further investigate the regular aug-cc-pVTZ and core-valence correlation aug-cc-pCVTZ basis sets as well as another core-property basis set, CP(PPP). While aug-cc-pVTZ-J provides hyperfine coupling constants that are almost identical to the converged series (aug-cc-pVTZ-Juc), we observe that not only the regular but also the core-valence correlation basis sets provide results far from the converged results. The usage of specialized core-basis sets leads to a large and highly significant improvement of the calculated hyperfine couplings in comparison with experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available