4.7 Review

Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review

Journal

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 760-771

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009

Keywords

Compact city; Green infrastructure; Green space change; Infill development; Public participation; Sustainable urban development

Funding

  1. research programme FUSE (Future Urban Sustainable Environment) of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
  2. Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (SLU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The compact city approach has gained global impact as a planning approach for sustainable development in areas with increasing urban population. Through densification and compact building, the approach aims to counteract negative effects of urban sprawl in terms of ineffective land-use and related environmental problems. In spite of its benefits various problems and challenges are associated with implementing the compact city approach. This review looks at the effects of urban densification and compact city development on urban green space and its planning. It identifies problems, challenges and strategies of urban green space planning during densification processes. Findings confirm that urban densification processes, including consolidation and infill development, can pose a threat to urban green space. However, the literature on the compact city approach often lacks specific suggestions for urban green space conservation and planning. Provision of urban green space in compact city environments and during densification processes is described as a major challenge. Loss of private urban green space rarely seems offset by provision of more public green space. Several ways are identified to deal with these challenges, while also highlighting research gaps, e.g., as to how loss of green space quantity can be offset by increased green space quality. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available