4.6 Article

Bronsted-NH4+ mechanism versus nitrite mechanism: new insight into the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 453-460

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0cp00256a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20525311, 20503022, 20433030, 20973139]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2005CB221408, 2007CB815206]
  3. Key Science & Technology Specific Projects of Fujian Province [2009HZ0002-1]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2009J05035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3 over V2O5-based catalysts is used worldwide to control NOx emission. Understanding the mechanisms involved is vital for the rational design of more effective catalysts. Here, we have performed a systematic density functional theory (DFT) study of a SCR reaction by using cluster models. Three possible mechanisms have been considered, namely (i) a Lewis acid mechanism, (ii) a Bronsted acid mechanism and (iii) a nitrite mechanism. Our calculations down-play the significance of mechanism (i) due to its high barrier as well as the incorrect reaction order. On the other hand, our calculations demonstrate that both mechanisms (ii) and (iii) can lead to a first order reaction with respect to NO with the predicted barriers being consistent with the experimental observations. Thus, we conclude: there exists two competitive pathways for SCR. Mechanism (ii) is dominant when the Bronsted acidity of the catalysts is relatively strong, while mechanism (iii) becomes important when Bronsted acidity is weak or absent. Importantly, we demonstrate that the latter two mechanisms share a common feature where N-N bond formation is ahead of N-H bond cleavage, in contrast to that in mechanism (i). Such a sequence provides an effective way to reduce the side reaction of ammonia combustion since the relatively strong N-N bond has already been formed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available