4.6 Article

Water formation at low temperatures by surface O-2 hydrogenation II: the reaction network

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 12, Issue 38, Pages 12077-12088

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0cp00251h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NOVA, the Netherlands Research School for Astronomy
  2. Seventh Framework Programme [238258]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, NWO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water is abundantly present in the Universe. It is the main component of interstellar ice mantles and a key ingredient for life. Water in space is mainly formed through surface reactions. Three formation routes have been proposed in the past: hydrogenation of surface O, O-2, and O-3. In a previous paper [Ioppolo et al., Astrophys. J., 2008, 686, 1474] we discussed an unexpected non-standard zeroth-order H2O2 production behaviour in O-2 hydrogenation experiments, which suggests that the proposed reaction network is not complete, and that the reaction channels are probably more interconnected than previously thought. In this paper we aim to derive the full reaction scheme for O-2 surface hydrogenation and to constrain the rates of the individual reactions. This is achieved through simultaneous H-atom and O-2 deposition under ultra-high vacuum conditions for astronomically relevant temperatures. Different H/O-2 ratios are used to trace different stages in the hydrogenation network. The chemical changes in the forming ice are followed by means of reflection absorption infrared spectroscopy (RAIRS). New reaction paths are revealed as compared to previous experiments. Several reaction steps prove to be much more efficient (H + O-2) or less efficient (H + OH and H-2 + OH) than originally thought. These are the main conclusions of this work and the extended network concluded here will have profound implications for models that describe the formation of water in space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available