4.6 Article

An ab initio/Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus study of the hydrogen-abstraction reactions of methyl ethers, H3COCH3-x(CH3)(x), x=0-2, by (OH)-O-center dot; mechanism and kinetics

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 12, Issue 26, Pages 7221-7233

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c002911d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [08/IN1./I2055]
  2. EU [MKTD-CT-2004-517248]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A theoretical study of the mechanism and kinetics of the H-abstraction reaction from dimethyl (DME), ethylmethyl (EME) and iso-propylmethyl (IPME) ethers by the (OH)-O-center dot radical has been carried out using the high-level methods CCSD(T)/CBS, G3 and G3MP2BH&H. The computationally less-expensive methods of G3 and G3MP2BH&H yield results for DME within 0.2-0.6 and 0.7-0.9 kcal mol(-1), respectively, of the coupled cluster, CCSD(T), values extrapolated to the basis set limit. So the G3 and G3MP2BH&H methods can be confidently used for the reactions of the higher ethers. A distinction is made between the two different kinds of H-atoms, classified as in/out-of the symmetry plane, and it is found that abstraction from the out-of-plane H-atoms proceeds through a stepwise mechanism involving the formation of a reactant complex in the entrance channel and product complex in the exit channel. The in-plane H-atom abstractions take place through a more direct mechanism and are less competitive. Rate constants of the three reactions have been calculated in the temperature range of 500-3000 K using the Variflex code, based on the weak collision, master equation/microcanonical variational RRKM theory including tunneling corrections. The computed total rate constants (cm(3) mol(-1) s(-1)) have been. fitted as follows: k(DME) = 2.74 x T-3.94 exp (1534.2/T), k(EME) = 20.93 x T-3.61 exp (2060.1/T) and k(IPME) = 0.55 x T-3.93 exp (2826.1/T). Expressions of the group rate constants for the three different carbon sites are also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available