4.6 Article

Single chain versus single aggregate spectroscopy of conjugated polymers. Where is the border?

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 12, Issue 37, Pages 11770-11777

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c001120g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Royal Physiographic Society in Lund
  3. Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. Crafoord Foundation
  5. Carl Trygger Foundation
  6. Marie Curie postdoctoral fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single chains of conjugated polymers e. g. MEH-PPV (poly(2-methoxy-5-(2'-ethylhexyloxy)-1,4- phenylenevinylene) have become interesting objects for single molecule spectroscopy (SMS) studies. However, most of the experiments so far were performed without full awareness of the isolation status of the polymer chains in host matrices. We used steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence methods and 2D polarization single molecule imaging technique to unravel the isolation/aggregation status of MEH-PPV in spin-coated films prepared at different conditions. It turned out that a sample showing isolated bright spots in fluorescence images could be obtained in a very broad concentration range of MEH-PPV when toluene was used as a solvent and PMMA as a matrix. If the MEH-PPV concentration was not sufficiently low, a substantial fraction of the fluorescence spots should be assigned to individual nano-aggregates rather than truly isolated chains of the polymer. Contrary to single aggregates, truly isolated MEH-PPV chains showed blue-shifted emission spectra, mono-exponential fluorescence decay dynamics with relatively long lifetimes (0.4-1.2 ns), and high polarization anisotropy. We argue that insufficient control of the concentration in the published SMS studies of MEH-PPV resulted in incorrect assigning of some spectroscopic properties of single aggregates to isolated MEH-PPV chains. We believe this to be the main origin of discrepancies among the published data in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available