4.6 Review

Optimal construction of a fast and accurate polarisable water potential based on multipole moments trained by machine learning

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 11, Issue 30, Pages 6365-6376

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b905748j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/C015231]
  2. BBSRC [BB/F003617/1]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F003617/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C015231/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To model liquid water correctly and to reproduce its structural, dynamic and thermodynamic properties warrants models that account accurately for electronic polarisation. We have previously demonstrated that polarisation can be represented by fluctuating multipole moments (derived by quantum chemical topology) predicted by multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) in response to the local structure of the cluster. Here we further develop this methodology of modeling polarisation enabling control of the balance between accuracy, in terms of errors in Coulomb energy and computing time. First, the predictive ability and speed of two additional machine learning methods, radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN) and Kriging, are assessed with respect to our previous MLP based polarisable water models, for water dimer, trimer, tetramer, pentamer and hexamer clusters. Compared to MLPs, we find that RBFNNs achieve a 14-26% decrease in median Coulomb energy error, with a factor 2.5-3 slowdown in speed, whilst Kriging achieves a 40-67% decrease in median energy error with a 6.5-8.5 factor slowdown in speed. Then, these compromises between accuracy and speed are improved upon through a simple multi-objective optimisation to identify Pareto-optimal combinations. Compared to the Kriging results, combinations are found that are no less accurate (at the 90th energy error percentile), yet are 58% faster for the dimer, and 26% faster for the pentamer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available