4.4 Article

Growth model investigation for AlN/Al(Ga)InN interface growth by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy for high electron mobility transistor applications

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201431236

Keywords

III-V semiconductors; high electron mobility transistors; molecular beam epitaxy; AlN; AlGaInN; interfaces

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Defense (BMVg), Bonn
  2. Bundeswehr Technical Center of Information Technology and Electronics (WTD81), Greding
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Bonn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterostructures with lattice matched Al(Ga)InN barriers have been widely investigated as alternative to standard AlGaN/GaN based high electron mobility transistor structures for high power applications. Mostly these heterostructures comprise a thin AlN based spacer between GaN channel and lattice matched barrier. One key issue for high quality plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (PA-MBE) of these structures is the control of the AlN-Al(Ga)InN interface since optimal growth conditions for high quality AlN differ significantly from those for growth of indium containing material. In this paper, a detailed analysis and a deduced model of the interface growth is presented. The Al/N ratio during AlN spacer growth is likely to influence the subsequent growth of quaternary Al(Ga)InN. Ideal Al/N ratio leads to high performance heterostructures, while slightly Al-rich conditions lead to the formation of Al residues on the substrate surface, which hinder subsequent epitaxial growth. Al/N ratios below unity lead to the deposition of ternary AlGaN instead of binary AlN spacers and to increased alloy scattering. An insertion of a thin GaN layer between spacer and barrier can hinder the formation of Al residues and leads to improved wafer homogeneity. (C) 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available