4.6 Article

Numerical simulation of piecewise-linear models of gene regulatory networks using complementarity systems

Journal

PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages 103-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2013.11.013

Keywords

Nonsmooth dynamical systems; Gene regulatory networks; Piecewise-linear models; Filippov solutions; Differential inclusions; Complementarity systems

Funding

  1. Agence National de la Recherche under project GeMCo [ANR-2010-BLAN-0201-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene regulatory networks control the response of living cells to changes in their environment. A class of piecewise-linear (PWL) models, which capture the switch-like interactions between genes by means of step functions, has been found useful for describing the dynamics of gene regulatory networks. The step functions lead to discontinuities in the right-hand side of the differential equations. This has motivated extensions of the PWL models based on differential inclusions and Filippov solutions, whose analysis requires sophisticated numerical tools. We present a method for the numerical analysis of one proposed extension, called Aizerman-Pyatnitskii (AP)-extension, by reformulating the PWL models as a mixed complementarity system (MCS). This allows the application of powerful methods developed for this class of nonsmooth dynamical systems, in particular those implemented in the SICONOS platform. We also show that under a set of reasonable biological assumptions, putting constraints on the right-hand side of the PWL models, AP-extensions and classical Filippov (F)-extensions are equivalent. This means that the proposed numerical method is valid for a range of different solution concepts. We illustrate the practical interest of our approach through the numerical analysis of three well-known networks developed in the field of synthetic biology. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available