4.7 Article

Sonochemical synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles loaded with folate and cisplatin: Effect of ultrasonic frequency

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 391-398

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.08.005

Keywords

Magnetic nanoparticle; Iron oxide; Folate; Cisplatin; Sonochemistry; Ultrasonic frequency effect

Funding

  1. CSIC
  2. MAT [2009-14741-C02-02]
  3. FSE
  4. JAE-CSIC predoctoral

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simple preparative methods were used to sonosynthesize different magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (FeNPs) via co-precipitation of aqueous solutions of ferrous salts in a basic aqueous solution of ethylene glycol (EG). Sonosynthesis was achieved using different frequencies of ultrasound: 581, 861, and 1141 kHz under the same acoustic power. The hydroxyl radicals generated by cavitational collapse, induced by the ultrasonic field, led to the oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+. The rate of sonochemical Fe3+ production decreased linearly with the frequency. Three different systems of FeNPs were synthesized, all with the same core but a different shell: FeNPs capped with EG (EG/FeNPs), FeNPs capped with EG and folate (Fol/EG/FeNPs), and FeNPs capped with EG, folate and cisplatin (Pt/EG/FeNPs). The nanoparticles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, fluorescence and Raman microspectroscopy, total-reflection X-ray fluorescence, and elemental analysis (C, N, and H). The magnetization hysteresis loops of these samples were also measured. The obtained values of saturation magnetization were within the interval between 60 and 93 A m(2) kg(-1). From the analysis of these results, it was found that the ultrasonic frequency did not affect the nanoparticle size (diameter of 21-31 nm). In contrast, the frequency affected the amount of drug loaded, as cisplatin loading increased proportionately with ultrasound frequency. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available