4.6 Article

On localised hotspots of an urban crime model

Journal

PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA
Volume 253, Issue -, Pages 23-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2013.02.005

Keywords

Homoclinic snaking; Singular perturbation analysis; Pattern formation

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H021450/1, EP/H05040X/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/H021779/1, EP/H05040X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H021779/1, EP/H05040X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate stationary, spatially localised crime hotspots on the real line and the plane of an urban crime model of Short et al. [M. Short, M. DOrsogna, A statistical model of criminal behavior, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 18 (2008) 1249-1267]. Extending the weakly nonlinear analysis of Short et al., we show in one-dimension that localised hotspots should bifurcate off the background spatially homogeneous state at a Turing instability provided the bifurcation is subcritical. Using path-following techniques, we continue these hotspots and show that the bifurcating pulses can undergo the process of homoclinic snaking near the singular limit. We analyse the singular limit to explain the existence of spike solutions and compare the analytical results with the numerical computations. In two-dimensions, we show that localised radial spots should also bifurcate off the spatially homogeneous background state. Localised planar hexagon fronts and hexagon patches are found and depending on the proximity to the singular limit these solutions either undergo homoclinic snaking or act like multi-spot solutions. Finally, we discuss applications of these localised patterns in the urban crime context and the full agent-based model. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available