4.7 Article

Application of hydrodynamic cavitation to improve the biodegradability of mature landfill leachate

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 378-387

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.03.003

Keywords

Hydrodynamic cavitation; Mature landfill leachate; Leachate pretreatment; Advanced oxidation processes; Enhanced biodegradability

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [7514/B/T02/2011/40]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the application of hydrodynamic cavitation to improve the biodegradability of mature land-fill leachate was investigated. Three configurations of cavitation device were examined and operational parameters of the process were selected. The study indicated that the orifice plate with a 3/10 mm diameter conical concentric hole, characterized by the cavitation number of 0.033, is a reasonable choice to ensure the enhanced biodegradability of mature leachate. Using such a configuration and maintaining 30 recirculation passes through the cavitation zone at inlet pressure of 7 bar, the highest increase of biodegradability index (BI) of approximately 22% occurred, i.e., from the value of 0.046 to 0.056. The FT-IR/PAS analysis confirmed a degradation of refractory compounds that typically prevail in mature leachate. An evaluation of energy efficiency was made in terms of the actual consumed energy measured by using the Kyoritsu KEW6310 Power Quality Tester. A cavitational yield of 9.8 mg COD kJ(-1) was obtained for the optimum configuration and 30 recirculation passes. Regarding energy efficiency, the application of 10 cavitation cycles appeared to be the most profitable. This was due to an almost threefold higher cavitational yield of 27.5 mg COD kJ(-1). However, the preferable option should be selected by considering a satisfactory effect in the biodegradability enhancement. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available