4.5 Article

Data mining of Ti-Al semi-empirical parameters for developing reduced order models

Journal

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 406, Issue 11, Pages 2055-2060

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2010.12.038

Keywords

Data mining; Descriptor selection; Semi-empirical calculations; Dimensionality reduction; lntermetallics; Electronic structure

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-06-10501, FA9550-08-1-0316]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-08-33853, CMMI 09-389018, PHY 09-41576, CCF09-17202]
  3. DARPA [HR001-06-1-0049]
  4. Army Research Office [W911NF-10-0397]
  5. Iowa State University
  6. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0751157] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A focus of materials design is determining the minimum amount of information necessary to fully describe a system, thus reducing the number of empirical results required and simplifying the data analysis. Screening descriptors calculated through a semi-empirical model, we demonstrate how an informatics-based analysis can be used to address this issue with no prior assumptions. We have developed a unique approach for identifying the minimum number of descriptors necessary to capture all the information of a system. Using Ti-Al alloys of varying compositions and crystal chemistries as the test bed, 5 of the 21 original descriptors from electronic structure calculations are found to capture all the information from the calculation, thereby reducing the structure-chemistry-property search space. Additionally, by combining electronic structure calculations with data mining, we classify the systems by chemistries and structures, based on the electronic structure inputs, and thereby rank the impact of change in chemistry and crystal structure on the electronic structure. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available