4.6 Article

Multifractal detrended cross-correlations between the Chinese exchange market and stock market

Journal

PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS
Volume 391, Issue 20, Pages 4855-4866

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2012.05.035

Keywords

Multifractal detrended cross-correlation; Chinese exchange market; Chinese stock market; Rolling windows

Funding

  1. National natural Science Foundation of China [70901044, 71073100]
  2. Science Foundation of Postdoctors in China [20100480577]
  3. Foundation of Jiangsu Government for Overseas Studies
  4. Qinglan Engineering Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the daily price data of the Chinese Yuan (RMB)/US dollar exchange rate and the Shanghai Stock Composite Index, we conducted an empirical analysis of the cross-correlations between the Chinese exchange market and stock market using the multifractal cross-correlation analysis method. The results demonstrate the overall significance of the cross-correlation based on the analysis of a statistic. Multifractality exists in cross-correlations, and the cross-correlated behavior of small fluctuations is more persistent than that of large fluctuations. Moreover, using the rolling windows method, we find that the cross-correlations between the Chinese exchange market and stock market vary with time and are especially sensitive to the reform of the RMB exchange rate regime. The previous reduction in the flexibility of the RMB exchange rate in July 2008. strengthened the persistence of cross-correlations and decreased the degree of multifractality, whereas the enhancement of the flexibility of the RMB exchange rate in June 2010 weakened the persistence of cross-correlations and increased the multifractality. Finally, several relevant discussions are provided to verify the robustness of our empirical analysis. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available