4.6 Article

An analysis of the radial flow in the heterogeneous porous media based on fractal and constructal tree networks

Journal

PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS
Volume 387, Issue 26, Pages 6471-6483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.08.021

Keywords

Radial flow; Heterogeneous porous media; Constructal tree network; Fractal; Permeability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10572052]
  2. Graduate Science & Technology Innovation Foundation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [HF-05-15-2007-012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an analysis of the radial flow in the heterogeneous porous media based on fractal and constructal tree networks is presented. A dual-domain model is applied to simulate the heterogeneous porous media embedded with a constructal tree network based on the fractal distribution of pore space and tortuosity nature of flow paths. The analytical expressions for seepage velocity, pressure drop, local and global permeability of the network and binary system are derived, and the transport properties for the optimal branching structure are discussed. Notable is that the global permeability (K-n) of the network and the volume fraction (f(n)) occupied by the network exhibit linear scaling law with the fractal dimension (D-p) of channel diameter bylogK(n) similar to 0.46D(p) and logf(n) similar to 1.03D(P), respectively. Our analytical results are in good agreement with the available numerical results for steady-state soil vapor extraction and indicate that the fractal dimension for pore space has significant effect on the permeable properties of the media. The proposed dual-domain model may capture the characteristics of heterogeneous porous media and help understanding the transport mechanisms of the radial flow in the media. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available