4.4 Article

Photosynthetic characterization of Rubisco transplantomic lines reveals alterations on photochemistry and mesophyll conductance

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
Volume 115, Issue 2-3, Pages 153-166

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-013-9848-8

Keywords

Carboxylation; CO2 fixation; Crop improvement; Water use efficiency

Categories

Funding

  1. ARC Fellowship [FT0991407]
  2. FPI Fellowship of the Government of the Balearic Islands
  3. [AGL2009-07999]
  4. [BFU2011-23294]
  5. Australian Research Council [FT0991407] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving Rubisco catalysis is considered a promising way to enhance C-3-photosynthesis and photosynthetic water use efficiency (WUE) provided the introduced changes have little or no impact on other processes affecting photosynthesis such as leaf photochemistry or leaf CO2 diffusion conductances. However, the extent to which the factors affecting photosynthetic capacity are co-regulated is unclear. The aim of the present study was to characterize the photochemistry and CO2 transport processes in the leaves of three transplantomic tobacco genotypes expressing hybrid Rubisco isoforms comprising different Flaveria L-subunits that show variations in catalysis and differing trade-offs between the amount of Rubisco and its activation state. Stomatal conductance (g (s)) in each transplantomic tobacco line matched wild-type, while their photochemistry showed co-regulation with the variations in Rubisco catalysis. A tight co-regulation was observed between Rubisco activity and mesophyll conductance (g (m)) that was independent of g (s) thus producing plants with varying g (m)/g (s) ratios. Since the g (m)/g (s) ratio has been shown to positively correlate with intrinsic WUE, the present results suggest that altering photosynthesis by modifying Rubisco catalysis may also be useful for targeting WUE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available